Hello David:

I  fear  that the only thing a guest appearance might do is further alienate
the professions. I have been accused more than once of being a PT hater!!

For the record, I am an OT lover, not a PT hater!!

Ron

=================================================
Monday, November 24, 2003, 4:12:32 PM, you wrote:

LD> Sorry buddy....I did realize it was not your quote after I read it again......

LD> Yes, please go on and on about this stuff, for after our meeting of
LD> OT and PT faculty students, you could feel the tension and it almost
LD> turned into a disaster....but, in the end, I think we came away with the
LD> students still not sure (and perhaps a few of us faculty members) as to
LD> that fine delineation of our professions.

LD> Anything to help, my friend, is appreciated.

LD> Perhaps a guest appearance?

LD> Peace,
LD> David

LD> David A. Lehman, PhD, PT
LD> Associate Professor
LD> Tennessee State University
LD> Department of Physical Therapy
LD> 3500 John A. Merritt Blvd.
LD> Nashville, TN 37209
LD> 615-963-5946
LD> [EMAIL PROTECTED]




LD> -----Original Message-----
LD> From: Ron Carson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LD> Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 2:39 PM
LD> To: Lehman, David
LD> Subject: Re[2]: [OTnow] Fwd: Re: History of the word "occupation"


LD> Hello David:

LD> I  am  not  the  author  of  the  indicated  quote! It came from a person at
LD> Merriam-Webster.

LD> Your  ascertain  that a "functional goal is often an 'occupational' goal, is
LD> something  to  which  I take exception. I have heard many therapists (mainly
LD> OT's) assert that function is the same as occupation.

LD> A  while  back, I wrote an OTnews article as to why I don't believe that the
LD> two are synonymous.

LD> Your last question is an important one - when is it appropriate for an OT to
LD> refer to a PT and when should a PT refer to an OT?

LD> Here's my answer...

LD> If the primary focus of the client and their condition is on remediation of
LD> physical  dysfunction,  the  best  skilled  profession if PT. If the primary
LD> concern  of  the  client and their condition is on occupational dysfunction,
LD> then OT is the most skilled profession.

LD> Putting  the  above two statements as end-points on a continuum, it makes it
LD> easier to see that I some cases OT is best, in other cases PT is best and in
LD> some cases, either profession is best.


LD>         OT                                                           PT
LD> <<------------------------------------------------------------------------>>
LD>     Focus on                                                     Focus on
LD> Occupational Dysfn                                            Physical Dysfn


LD> In  any case example, the greater the focus on occupation, the greater OT is
LD> the most correct profession.  Thus, for any continuum of care, a patient may
LD> at  times  be  best  served  by  PT and then later best served by OT.  Or, a
LD> client  my  be  best served by OT for some occupational dysfunction and then
LD> later referred to PT for some physical dysfunction.

LD> One  caveat to the above 'referral guide' is that therapists must understand
LD> that  there  is not a clear relationship between improving physical function
LD> and  increasing  occupational  dysfunction. In other words, simply improving
LD> physical   function   does   not  always  directly  correlate  to  improved
LD> occupational improvement.

LD> I can go on and on about this 'stuff' if you are interested.


LD> =================================================
LD> Monday, November 24, 2003, 10:23:02 AM, you wrote:

LD>> Ron...I cannot believe you made this interpretation in your last post:

LD>> " In any case, it seems to me that occupational therapy is called just
LD>> that because of its focus on activity, compared to, say, physical
LD>> therapy. A physical therapist would help a victim of a car accident
LD>> regain muscle tone in his or her legs and the ability to walk, but an
LD>> occupational therapist would teach the person how to climb a ladder, how
LD>> to go up and down stairs, etc."


LD>> The whole problem here, as it seems to me, is that physical therapy
LD>> is concerned with "function" as it is necessary that any goal we write
LD>> for a patient has to go beyond the impairment improving but be related
LD>> to a functional goal.  

LD>> The functional goal is often an "occupational" goal based on what
LD>> it is the patient wants to accomplish with therapy.  I cannot say, OK,
LD>> you now have "X" degrees in knee/hip flexion and your LE strength is
LD>> "X".....now, I am referring you to an OT to learn to climb the ladder. 
LD>> I would think that a higher level thinking PT would be able to take
LD>> their client to "that next step".  

LD>> However......I want you to know that I still am trying to
LD>> incorporate understanding and knowledge into my students activities of
LD>> our limitations as dictated by modern medical model, and to lead them to
LD>> understanding that OT is a vital aspect of a person's recovery and that
LD>> we need to know when to refer:)

LD>> Peace brother



LD>> David A. Lehman, PhD, PT
LD>> Associate Professor
LD>> Tennessee State University
LD>> Department of Physical Therapy
LD>> 3500 John A. Merritt Blvd.
LD>> Nashville, TN 37209
LD>> 615-963-5946
LD>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]




LD>> -----Original Message-----
LD>> From: Ron Carson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LD>> Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 6:34 AM
LD>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LD>> Subject: [OTnow] Fwd: Re: History of the word "occupation"


LD>> Hello:

LD>> A  while  back,  I  wrote  Merriam-Webster  about  the  history  of the word
LD>> 'occupation'. Below is their response.

LD>> Ron

LD>> -----

LD>> This is a forwarded message
LD>> From: Judy Yeh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
LD>> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
LD>> Date: Tuesday, November 11, 2003
LD>> Subject: History of the word "occupation"

LD>> =================Original message text===============

LD>> "Occupation" is related to the word "occupy," and both words ultimately
LD>> come from the same Latin root word meaning "to seize, to possess or take
LD>> up." An occupation is a taking up of something: occupation of another
LD>> country is the taking up or seizing of land; an occupation in the sense
LD>> of "an activity" is something that takes up one's time; occupation
LD>> meaning "a vocation, profession, employment" is the taking up of one's
LD>> time, energies, and life.

LD>> This word is very old, and has been in use for centuries. "Occupation"
LD>> in the sense of "employment, business, and/or an activity" has been
LD>> around since the 1300s at least and was used by authors like Chaucer.

LD>> However, "occupational" is more recent. The _Oxford English Dictionary_
LD>> gives a citation for it from 1850, and I am unaware of any earlier
LD>> appearances of this word.

LD>> As for the naming of occupational therapy...I should begin by saying
LD>> that I don't know much about occupational therapy, but from reading
LD>> several Web pages about the history of occupational therapy and related
LD>> disciplines put up by college students studying occupational therapy
LD>> (like

LD>> http://www.ceap.wcu.edu/hhp/students/JeffMansfield/archive/rthistory.html
LD>> http://www.angelfire.com/ut/otpsych/history.html
LD>> http://tiger.towson.edu/users/ptappe1/historyOT.htm

LD>> I drew these conclusions:

LD>> 1) Occupational therapy is rooted in efforts in the 1700s and 1800s to
LD>> improve the well-being of mentally ill and infirm people. 

LD>> 2) These forerunners of modern-day occupational therapists tried to make
LD>> the lives of the mentally ill and infirm more fulfilling by finding them
LD>> activities to *occupy* their time and teaching them skills that would be
LD>> useful in an *occupation*. 

LD>> 3) Nowadays, occupational therapy is concerned with rehabilitating
LD>> sufferers of physical illness: injuries (often obtained at work--one's
LD>> *occupation*), disabilities, and infirmity. (Perhaps the field of
LD>> occupational therapy expanded in the US after soldiers returned from the
LD>> first World War?)

LD>> 4) Someone claimed on the Internet that George Edward Barton was the
LD>> originator of the term "occupational therapy"
LD>> 
(http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&th=61e953aaa46c2c35&rnum=1).
LD>> I can't prove or disprove his assertion at the moment,
LD>> but you may find the writing I linked to to be interesting reading.

LD>> In any case, it seems to me that occupational therapy is called just
LD>> that because of its focus on activity, compared to, say, physical
LD>> therapy. A physical therapist would help a victim of a car accident
LD>> regain muscle tone in his or her legs and the ability to walk, but an
LD>> occupational therapist would teach the person how to climb a ladder, how
LD>> to go up and down stairs, etc.

LD>> I think one reason why occupational therapy remains unknown is that it
LD>> is often confused with physical therapy. But as the population
LD>> (especially the "baby boomer" segment) ages, knowledge of occupational
LD>> therapy will probably spread, since more people will find themselves
LD>> needing the services of occupational therapists.

LD>> I hope I have been helpful. Thank you for writing to Merriam-Webster.

LD>> Sincerely,

LD>> Judy Yeh
LD>> Assistant Editor
LD>> Merriam-Webster, Inc.
LD>> 47 Federal Street, P.O. Box 281 
LD>> Springfield, MA 01102 
LD>> Phone: 413-734-3134, ext. 133 
LD>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
LD>> http://www.Merriam-Webster.com 
LD>> http://www.WordCentral.com 
LD>> http://www.merriam-websterunabridged.com
LD>> http://www.merriam-webstercollegiate.com




LD>> ==============End of original message text===========


LD>> _______________________________________________
LD>> To unsubscribe, visit:
LD>> http://otnow.com/mailman/listinfo/otlist_otnow.com

LD>> The OTnow Mail Archive: 
LD>> www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LD>> ===============================================

LD>> _______________________________________________
LD>> To unsubscribe, visit:
LD>> http://otnow.com/mailman/listinfo/otlist_otnow.com

LD>> The OTnow Mail Archive:
LD>> www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



LD> _______________________________________________
LD> To unsubscribe, visit:
LD> http://otnow.com/mailman/listinfo/otlist_otnow.com

LD> The OTnow Mail Archive: 
LD> www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LD> ===============================================

LD> _______________________________________________
LD> To unsubscribe, visit:
LD> http://otnow.com/mailman/listinfo/otlist_otnow.com

LD> The OTnow Mail Archive:
LD> www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, visit: http://otnow.com/mailman/listinfo/otlist_otnow.com

The OTnow Mail Archive: 
www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
===============================================

Reply via email to