Sorry about the way the post looks. For some reason it wouldn't wrap right.
Audra Ray

--- On Tue, 10/28/08, Audra Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

From: Audra Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Best Practice
To: OTlist@OTnow.com
Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2008, 6:45 PM

"However, the goal is the occupation, not
the  components. FOCUSED component level treatment is the realm of PT.
And  if it's not, it should be. Because when the focus of treatment is
on the component(s), it can't be also on the occupation. And, I do not
think  a  therapist  can  mentally  switch  from  component  level  to
occupation  level  treatment. Maybe I'm wrong, but I think it's one or
the other."In reply to your post Ron, I disagree. Some of our clients
cannot do the occupation because of something, whether it is pain, lack of ROM,
decreased strength. I think we are very qualified to address the issues that
limit the person from completing occupation. In fact,I think it is our job to
find these problems and address them. The goal being to be independent or
require less assistance with the occupation being addressed.I guess we'll
have to agree to disagree Ron.Thanks for listening,Audra Ray, OTR/L



      
--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com



      
--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

Reply via email to