On 16.04.2019 12:45, David Marchand wrote:
> At the moment, a malicious guest might negotiate VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ and
> !VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ in a loop which would be seen as qp_num going from 1 to
> n and n to 1 continuously, triggering datapath reconfigurations at each
> transition.
>
> Limit this by only reconfiguring on increased qp_num.
> The previous patch reduced the observed cost of polling disabled queues,
> so the only cost is memory.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com>
> ---
It seems weird to ACK my own code. You may credit me in some other way
like From/Suggested/Co-authored tags. Any of them is OK for me.
Please, refer the Documentation/internals/contributing/submitting-patches.rst
for details and additional constraints (like additional sign-offs).
Same for the next patch.
BTW, It's completely unnecessary to send new versions of the patch-set in
reply to the previous. This is specific to DPDK mail-list and not a
common practice. Complicates reading the list and searching for the right
patch versions.
> lib/netdev-dpdk.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
> index 9ba8e67..fc554db 100644
> --- a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
> +++ b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
> @@ -3510,8 +3510,8 @@ new_device(int vid)
> newnode = dev->socket_id;
> }
>
> - if (dev->requested_n_txq != qp_num
> - || dev->requested_n_rxq != qp_num
> + if (dev->requested_n_txq < qp_num
> + || dev->requested_n_rxq < qp_num
> || dev->requested_socket_id != newnode) {
> dev->requested_socket_id = newnode;
> dev->requested_n_rxq = qp_num;
>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
