On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 3:51 PM Ilya Maximets <i.maxim...@samsung.com> wrote:
> On 16.04.2019 12:45, David Marchand wrote: > > At the moment, a malicious guest might negotiate VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ and > > !VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ in a loop which would be seen as qp_num going from 1 to > > n and n to 1 continuously, triggering datapath reconfigurations at each > > transition. > > > > Limit this by only reconfiguring on increased qp_num. > > The previous patch reduced the observed cost of polling disabled queues, > > so the only cost is memory. > > > > Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com> > > --- > > It seems weird to ACK my own code. You may credit me in some other way > like From/Suggested/Co-authored tags. Any of them is OK for me. > Please, refer the > Documentation/internals/contributing/submitting-patches.rst > for details and additional constraints (like additional sign-offs). > Same for the next patch. > I did not want to take all the glory for me :-) The code is mainly yours, so Co-authored-by + SoB. > BTW, It's completely unnecessary to send new versions of the patch-set in > reply to the previous. This is specific to DPDK mail-list and not a > common practice. Complicates reading the list and searching for the right > patch versions. > Ok, so I won't chain the new version. -- David Marchand _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
