Where are the stats about how U/S has improved the outcomes? As 1 who had a C/s because the scan said my son was lge and post dates neither of which he was - the false results of scans need to be balanced against the positives now that would be interesting!! AIMS and others have been warning about scans for years so this result is not left of feild for many/all!! Denise ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrea Robertson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 8:05 AM Subject: Ultrasound dangers
> Hi everyone, > > The news about ultrasound this morning is very interesting. I suggest you > read the full story that is printed in the Sydney Morning Herald today. > Click here for more: > > http://www.smh.com.au/news/0112/10/national/national10.html > > It will be interesting to see how far this story is taken and whether it > will be followed up in other media. I think many pregnant women would want > to know about this!! > > Regards, > > Andrea > > ----- > Andrea Robertson > Birth International * ACE Graphics * Associates in Childbirth Education > > e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > web: www.birthinternational.com > > > -- > This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics. > Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe. -- This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics. Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.
