I think my understanding of that 'facilitators' slide
is that those facilitators are indeed interfacing
with the bidirectional BT (as server [publishing, takedownable],
and as client [downloading, a lesser action]) protocol.
And then redistributing that content privately within
the peersm network. My only issue with that would
be that, if so, you are still exposing those clearnet
interfaces to needless takedown for their publishing
component, whereas 'filesharing' users could simply
elect to build their communities entirely underground
with never any interface to clearnet and its protocols.
A slower, less instant growth, but a safer one to be sure.
(And I usually only advocate for sharing content users
have right to.) I may be very wrong on this understanding
of the slide in question. I will read your links further to
determine the case regarding interface to clearnet. Thanks.
_______________________________________________
p2p-hackers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers

Reply via email to