Le 13/05/2014 19:12, grarpamp a écrit :
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 7:35 AM, Aymeric Vitte <[email protected]> wrote:
The question is how to *use* Bittorrent (or some incremental iteration
atop Bittorrent) while protecting the network from automated copyright
takedown.
Maybe http://www.peersm.com
No. The slides show use of clearnet interface to BT/web so those
RTC exit 'browsers/people' running it there are still at risk. Quite
uncool for peersm users to offload their content risk onto such
gateways via tor protocol.
What is uncool compared to a Tor exit node? The facilitators are
bridging to bt/web, until the bt clients can talk the browser's language
(WebSocket, WebRTC), they are not really necessary for the web since you
can access the Tor network via WebSockets.
But even if bt clients could talk with peersm users this does not solve
the issues of bt protocol, really too transparent.
"they're not solveable with clearnet solutions. ... BT is and will be
insufficient until you [run it entirely within] an anonymous net, or it
becomes one itself"
That's what we are trying to propose with peersm protocol.
_______________________________________________
p2p-hackers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
--
Peersm : http://www.peersm.com
node-Tor : https://www.github.com/Ayms/node-Tor
GitHub : https://www.github.com/Ayms
_______________________________________________
p2p-hackers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
