Hi Cyril, Thanks for your review and comments. Much Appreciated.
Let me sink up with my co-authors and reply to you with a proposed text. Regards, Dhruv On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 2:07 AM, Cyril Margaria <cyril.marga...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have reviewed the id. > > I think the document describes well the TLS procedure. > > I have the following comments/questions on the nonTLS support: what should > a PCE peer do when the error code "pcep startTLS failure" and error value > 3 or 4. > > For error value 3 i believe closing the connection shoud be done > For error code 4 (ok without TLS) should the peer: > > A)Continue without TLS at all > > B) close and reconnect without using tls > > A) would require more descrption of that case. B) would require the peer > to retry without tls or require a reconfiguration. The reconnect introduces > more states (how long to keep retrying withiut tls,... etc) > > I think those points should be specified. > > Best regards > Cyril > On Oct 8, 2015 18:57, "JP Vasseur (jvasseur)" <jvass...@cisco.com> wrote: > >> Dear WG, >> >> This starts a 2-week WG Last Call on draft-ietf-pce-pceps-04, ending on >> Oct 23 at noon ET. Please send your comments to the authors and copy the >> list. >> >> Thanks. >> >> JP, Julien and Jon. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pce mailing list >> Pce@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
