Hi,
Looks like pretty good support for all three drafts from where I am
standing.
draft-bitar-zhang-interas-pcecp-reqs-01.txt
Authors, please re-submit as draft-ietf-interas-pcecp-reqs-00.txt
Please do not make any changes to the draft except for the name and the date
draft-bryskin-pce-policy-enabled-path-comp-02.txt
Authors, please re-submit as draft-ietf-pce-policy-enabled-path-comp-00.txt
Please change the intended status to Informational
draft-vasseur-pce-brpc-00.txt
We have support for this becoming a WG I-D, but as discussed, JP will first
make a quick update (not a WG I-D) to include the clarifications requested
on the mailing list to cover scope and procedure, and also an explicit
mention of the Path Key ID option.
Thanks,
Adrian
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
