Hi Adrian,
see inline.
Adrian Farrel wrote:
Hi,
Resulting from the discussions in Montreal, we would like to take your
opinions on the adoption of three I-Ds as working group drafts.
draft-bitar-zhang-interas-pcecp-reqs-01.txt
This draft sets out the requirements for PCEP in an inter-AS scenario.
It has been refined considerably over the last couple of iterations
and is now limited to just the requirements for this situation. We may
need to do more work on it as a WG document, but the authors and
chairs believe it is in good enough shape to be the basis of the WG work.
Yes
draft-bryskin-pce-policy-enabled-path-comp-02.txt
Policy forms part of the PCE architecture, and this document fleshes
out the details of the use of policy in a PCE context.
There was some discussion in Montreal about whether to wait to include
details of policy for recovery path computation, but the chairs feel
that this scenarion (and any other relevant scenarios) can be safely
added once the I-D is a working group draft. Further, there was
support from the service providers in the room in Montreal for
adopting this I-D.
Yes, except that its category should be Informational. This is the first
framework document that I've seen that's standards track.
draft-vasseur-pce-brpc-00.txt
This draft describes an application procedure for PCE in the
inter-domain case.
There has been some discussion of this draft on the mailing list
resulting in the request for a few clarifications of scope and
procedure, and also an explicit mention of the Path Key ID option.
Since JP is the lead author on this work, I think that the correct
procedure is for JP to make a quick update before this becomes a WG
I-D, but while we are polling I would like to ask your opinion on this
I-D assuming that JP makes the necessary changes.
Yes
Simple Yes and No answers will do, but reasons are always helpful.
Cheers,
Adrian
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
