Hi, Yes to all 3 I-Ds. I think the authors of ***.interas-pcecp-reqs-01.txt should work more closely with the work done in ***.pce-policy-enabled-path-comp-02.txt.
Cheers, Meral Selon Adrian Farrel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > Resulting from the discussions in Montreal, we would like to take your > opinions on the adoption of three I-Ds as working group drafts. > > draft-bitar-zhang-interas-pcecp-reqs-01.txt > This draft sets out the requirements for PCEP in an inter-AS scenario. It > has been refined considerably over the last couple of iterations and is now > limited to just the requirements for this situation. We may need to do more > work on it as a WG document, but the authors and chairs believe it is in > good enough shape to be the basis of the WG work. > > draft-bryskin-pce-policy-enabled-path-comp-02.txt > Policy forms part of the PCE architecture, and this document fleshes out the > details of the use of policy in a PCE context. > There was some discussion in Montreal about whether to wait to include > details of policy for recovery path computation, but the chairs feel that > this scenarion (and any other relevant scenarios) can be safely added once > the I-D is a working group draft. Further, there was support from the > service providers in the room in Montreal for adopting this I-D. > > draft-vasseur-pce-brpc-00.txt > This draft describes an application procedure for PCE in the inter-domain > case. > There has been some discussion of this draft on the mailing list resulting > in the request for a few clarifications of scope and procedure, and also an > explicit mention of the Path Key ID option. > Since JP is the lead author on this work, I think that the correct procedure > is for JP to make a quick update before this becomes a WG I-D, but while we > are polling I would like to ask your opinion on this I-D assuming that JP > makes the necessary changes. > > Simple Yes and No answers will do, but reasons are always helpful. > > Cheers, > Adrian > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
