Alan wrote: > But to be serious, I believe they have learnt that their top end bodies did > not sell very well (really belong to Nikon, Canon and Minolta), so they have > been very careful when it comes to top end bodies. Actually, Pentax has been far more sucessful than Minolta regarding sales of expensive bodies. >Afterall, they cannot > make too many mistakes like the LX, the SFX series and the Z-1 series did. > And a product line is nothing without enough earning. The LX was extremely sucessful and I believe the SFX was too judging from the number autofocus F lenses (1.5 million) they sold in the 2-3 years they were offered. In comparioson, the FA series took 7 years to reach the same volume. Pål - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Visit the PUG at http://pug.komkon.org.
- Re: just talked to Pentax ...(about the MZ-S) Pål Jensen
- Re: just talked to Pentax ...(about the MZ-S) Pål Jensen
- Re: just talked to Pentax ...(about the MZ-S) Jeff Tsai
- Re: just talked to Pentax ...(about the MZ-S) Pål Jensen
- Re: just talked to Pentax ...(about the MZ-S) Pål Jensen
- Re: just talked to Pentax ...(about the MZ-S) Alexander Krohe
- RE: just talked to Pentax ...(about the MZ-S) Frits J. Wüthrich
- RE: just talked to Pentax ...(about the MZ-S) Alexander Krohe
- Re: just talked to Pentax ...(about the MZ-S) Bojidar Dimitrov
- Re: just talked to Pentax ...(about the MZ-S) Alan Chan
- Re: just talked to Pentax ...(about the MZ-S) Alan Chan
- Re: just talked to Pentax ...(about the MZ-S) Alan Chan
- Re: just talked to Pentax ...(about the MZ-S) Alan Chan
- Re: just talked to Pentax ...(about the MZ-S) Alan Chan
- Re: just talked to Pentax ...(about the MZ-S) Pål Jensen
- Re: just talked to Pentax ...(about the MZ-S) Norman Baugher
- Re: just talked to Pentax ...(about the MZ-... Michel Adam