I would have done the same. By NOT hosting this list
officially, they remove a subtle pressure to hold back criticism.
And constructive criticism is worth it's weight in gold for a
company.
They were getting superior feedback whitout the expense
of organising focus group, and they are getting even more
now.
Their new 'flagship' camera is targeted at just the kind of
sophisticated users that makes up the readership of this list.
That some point-and-shoot crowd might have money to burn
and buy this new camera because of status is just a bonus for
them.
Michel
From: Norman Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I kinda doubt that, otherwise they would still be hosting this list.
> Norm
>
> From: Alan Chan
> > I was thinking, maybe Pentax did indeed monitor this list and value our
> > opinions carefully.
>
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Visit the PUG at
> http://pug.komkon.org.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Visit the PUG at
http://pug.komkon.org.
