Bob Walkden wrote: > > I've found the Carl Zeiss lenses > to have a more consistent flavour > in both b&w and colour film than > the Pentax lenses I had [...] > This subjective comparison (and > that's all it is) is based on > results on Scala b&w slides and > on Kodachrome colour slides. Hi Bob ... In what wy are you able to observe this consistency with Scala? > Normally when I shoot b&w > I use either a green of a > yellow/green filter, but these > are Contax filters (though made > by Hoya, I think). Using filters will change the characteristics of the lenses, so have you done ny sort of comparison without filters? -- Shel Belinkoff mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "The difference between a good photograph and a great photograph is subtleties." - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org.
- Re: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 micro... Aaron Reynolds
- Re: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 micro) Rob Studdert
- Re: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 micro) Alan Chan
- Re: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 micro) SudaMafud
- Re: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 micro) Shel Belinkoff
- Re: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 micro) Mike Johnston
- Re: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 micro) Pål Jensen
- Re: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 micro) Rob Studdert
- Re: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 micro... Norman Baugher
- Re[2]: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.... Bob Walkden
- Re[2]: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm... Shel Belinkoff
- Re[2]: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 1... Bob Walkden
- Re: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 micro) Alin Flaider
- Re: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 micro) SETH
- SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 micro) Mike Johnston
- Re: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 micro) Rob Studdert