[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > << as well as having recently > purchased new and used A-series > lenses, and a new FA lens, > and each series show differences > in the the coatings. >> > > How did they look after an ROR cleaning job? The new ones have not been cleaned. The older ones look like the newer ones of their series, and, as I said earlier, each series show differences in the the coatings. -- Shel Belinkoff mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "The difference between a good photograph and a great photograph is subtleties." - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org.
- SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 micro) Mike Johnston
- Re: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 micro) David A. Mann
- Re: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 micro... Aaron Reynolds
- Re: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 micro) Rob Studdert
- Re: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 micro) Alan Chan
- Re: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 micro) SudaMafud
- Re: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 micro) Shel Belinkoff
- Re: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 micro) Mike Johnston
- Re: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 micro) Pål Jensen
- Re: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 micro) Rob Studdert
- Re: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 micro... Norman Baugher
- Re[2]: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.... Bob Walkden
- Re: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3... Shel Belinkoff
- Re[2]: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 1... Bob Walkden
- Re: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 micro) Alin Flaider
- Re: SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 micro) SETH
- SMC again (was Re: Pentax AF 100 mm f3.5 micro) Mike Johnston