In a message dated 2/17/01 10:59:30 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << I do know I see a lot of badly underexposed film coming through the lab these days, but I suspect this has more to do with people insisting on buying zoom lens piss and shit cameras with maximum apertures of f11. I miss my pro lab sometimes. William Robb >> Doesn't shooting one-use cameras loaded with ISO 100, 200 and 400 film, in conjunction with those f/11 lenses, contribute greatly to the underexposure phenomenon Bill? Mafud [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- Re: Fast film to go with Porta 160 SudaMafud
- Re: Fast film to go with Porta 160 SudaMafud
- Re: Fast film to go with Porta 160 William Robb
- Re: Fast film to go with Porta 160 Aaron Reynolds
- Re: Fast film to go with Porta 160 William Robb
- Re: Fast film to go with Porta 160 SudaMafud
- Re: Fast film to go with Porta 160 SudaMafud
- Re: Fast film to go with Porta 160 William Robb
- Re: Fast film to go with Porta 160 John Mustarde
- Re: printfilm rating - fact or fiction? Bill D. Casselberry
- Re: Fast film to go with Porta 160 SudaMafud
- Re: Fast film to go with Porta 160 William Robb
- Re: Fast film to go with Porta 160 Todd Stanley
- Re: Fast film to go with Porta 160 SudaMafud
- Re: Fast film to go with Porta 160 William Robb
- Re: Fast film to go with Porta 160 SudaMafud
- OT: Single use cameras and the film that is in th... William Robb
- Hick Country Re: OT: Single use cameras petit miam
- Re: Hick Country Re: OT: Single use camer... William Robb