Mike - you say "...and you couldn't mix and match..." If your hypothetical situation allows me to mix and match lenses from different generations on the one generation body, I will go with the MZ-S every time. I have been giving serious thought to downsizing my collection of bodies and lenses; I have about decided that the good features of the LX just don't get used by me all that often, and I should sell them. On the other hand, mostly I am using K or A series lenses on my MZ-S. If your situation required me to use F and FA lenses on the MZ-S, I would go back to the LX.
Stan ---------- on 12/17/02 3:30 PM, Mike Johnston at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> If Pentax...would >> have applied advances in autofocus, image >> stabilization...how many of you would >> be still shooting with Pentax (a majority brand)? Or >> would you be shooting Canon FD and poking jealous fun >> at Pentax snobs <G>? > > > Hah! Great point. > > Canon is so good at being Canon, nobody else has to be Canon.... > > So let me ask a hypothetical question here. Asked of everyone. IF you have > to choose between EITHER the older, metal bodied, manual focus Pentax family > (Spotmatics, M series, A series, up to LX) ***OR*** the > polycarbonate-bodied, AF Pentax family (P series, ZX series, up to > MZ-S)--and you couldn't mix and match and you couldn't use both--which would > it be? > > I guess since my main Pentax is an ESII you know which way I lean. > > --Mike > >
