Hi, You all write about quality of digital vs medium format etc. and I have a question. What about shooting at very low temperatures ( I means -10C or lower)? Does digital camera can still work well, since it takes plenty of power etc.Everybody knows how for instance calculators/watches behave at such temperatures. So please write any comments/experiences. Alek Użytkownik Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał: >Mike, > >I think there is one aspect where 67 beats digital. That is in cost >for amateurs (meaning not making a living from their photography). >Until your shooting quantity goes up quite a bit, cost will probably >be one of the last strongholds of the film world for awhile. > >Not only that, we live in a "good enough" society right now, where >price/cost is more important than quality. I believe that for many >uses, 6MP D100 and D60 quality is "good enough" and that most won't >want to pay much more than that. > >One more interesting note: I have watched a few photographers shooting >digital and talked with a few, who indicate that they shoot more >frames per session/subject than they did with film. The usual cited >reason is lack of cost to shoot the frames. By shooting more, they >insure/improve the likelihood of getting the shots they need. Doesn't >seem to be that much different in mindset than taking a video camera >and just let it run and then pick the best frame out of it. One >starts to wonder if that will occur (whether with a vidcam or >digicam). It would certainly change the style and role of the >photographer. > > >Bruce > > > >Wednesday, January 15, 2003, 3:18:47 PM, you wrote: > >MJ> Can digital beat 6x7? > >MJ> I thought the denizens of the PDML might be interested in these comments >MJ> from my friend Michael Reichmann, who runs the Luminous Landscape website >MJ> and publishes "The Video Journal," a photography magazine on DVD. I have >MJ> Michael's permission to quote from his private e-mails: > > >>>>>> >MJ> I'm using a Canon 1Ds. The most remarkable photographic product I've >MJ> ever owned. Almost large format image quality from 35mm. It's hard not >MJ> to sound too enthusiastic about it. > >MJ> I sold my Pentax 645 outfit when I got the 1Ds. No contest. > >MJ> I have hung on to the Pentax 67 for the past couple of months, but with >MJ> every test I did, including side by side shoots the 1Ds images always >MJ> came out on top; resolution, colour purity, grain, everything. > >MJ> So last week I took it all to my favourite online dealer and he's going >MJ> to be selling it for me. > >MJ> I'm hanging on to my Hasselblad XPan and M Leica gear. Other than that >MJ> I'm now all digital. >MJ> <<<< > > >MJ> Michael favorably reviewed both the Pentax 645N and 67 on his site, and has >MJ> used both extensively in the field along with his previous Rollei 6008 >MJ> system. In parallel, he was going digital with the D30 when it came out. > >MJ> By the way, when Michael says "every test I did, including side by side >MJ> shoots," he really means it--he actually runs the tests and looks at the >MJ> results. In my experience of him, he truly has no particular axe to grind. > >MJ> Looks like it's really getting to be a new world now. > >MJ> --Mike >
***************r-e-k-l-a-m-a************** Chcesz oszczędzić na kosztach obsługi bankowej ? mBIZNES - konto dla firm http://epieniadze.onet.pl/mbiznes
