Is for instance D100 equipped with the cord to have batteries under a jacket? Alek Użytkownik T Rittenhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał: >The camera should work even better at low tempuratures. The batteries are >the problem. If you can get them separated from the camera by a cord and >keep the batteries in an inside pocket a digital camera should be great for >cold weather photography. > >Ciao, >Graywolf >http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 1:12 PM >Subject: Re: Re: Can digital beat 6x7? Answer seems to be yes > > >> Hi, >> You all write about quality of digital vs medium format etc. and I have a >question. >> What about shooting at very low temperatures ( I means -10C or lower)? >Does digital camera can still work well, since it takes plenty of power >etc.Everybody knows how for instance calculators/watches behave at such >temperatures. >> So please write any comments/experiences. >> Alek >> Użytkownik Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał: >> >Mike, >> > >> >I think there is one aspect where 67 beats digital. That is in cost >> >for amateurs (meaning not making a living from their photography). >> >Until your shooting quantity goes up quite a bit, cost will probably >> >be one of the last strongholds of the film world for awhile. >> > >> >Not only that, we live in a "good enough" society right now, where >> >price/cost is more important than quality. I believe that for many >> >uses, 6MP D100 and D60 quality is "good enough" and that most won't >> >want to pay much more than that. >> > >> >One more interesting note: I have watched a few photographers shooting >> >digital and talked with a few, who indicate that they shoot more >> >frames per session/subject than they did with film. The usual cited >> >reason is lack of cost to shoot the frames. By shooting more, they >> >insure/improve the likelihood of getting the shots they need. Doesn't >> >seem to be that much different in mindset than taking a video camera >> >and just let it run and then pick the best frame out of it. One >> >starts to wonder if that will occur (whether with a vidcam or >> >digicam). It would certainly change the style and role of the >> >photographer. >> > >> > >> >Bruce >> > >> > >> > >> >Wednesday, January 15, 2003, 3:18:47 PM, you wrote: >> > >> >MJ> Can digital beat 6x7? >> > >> >MJ> I thought the denizens of the PDML might be interested in these >comments >> >MJ> from my friend Michael Reichmann, who runs the Luminous Landscape >website >> >MJ> and publishes "The Video Journal," a photography magazine on DVD. I >have >> >MJ> Michael's permission to quote from his private e-mails: >> > >> > >> >>>>>> >> >MJ> I'm using a Canon 1Ds. The most remarkable photographic product I've >> >MJ> ever owned. Almost large format image quality from 35mm. It's hard >not >> >MJ> to sound too enthusiastic about it. >> > >> >MJ> I sold my Pentax 645 outfit when I got the 1Ds. No contest. >> > >> >MJ> I have hung on to the Pentax 67 for the past couple of months, but >with >> >MJ> every test I did, including side by side shoots the 1Ds images always >> >MJ> came out on top; resolution, colour purity, grain, everything. >> > >> >MJ> So last week I took it all to my favourite online dealer and he's >going >> >MJ> to be selling it for me. >> > >> >MJ> I'm hanging on to my Hasselblad XPan and M Leica gear. Other than >that >> >MJ> I'm now all digital. >> >MJ> <<<< >> > >> > >> >MJ> Michael favorably reviewed both the Pentax 645N and 67 on his site, >and has >> >MJ> used both extensively in the field along with his previous Rollei >6008 >> >MJ> system. In parallel, he was going digital with the D30 when it came >out. >> > >> >MJ> By the way, when Michael says "every test I did, including side by >side >> >MJ> shoots," he really means it--he actually runs the tests and looks at >the >> >MJ> results. In my experience of him, he truly has no particular axe to >grind. >> > >> >MJ> Looks like it's really getting to be a new world now. >> > >> >MJ> --Mike >> > >> >> >> ***************r-e-k-l-a-m-a************** >> >> Chcesz oszczędzić na kosztach obsługi bankowej ? >> mBIZNES - konto dla firm >> http://epieniadze.onet.pl/mbiznes >> >
***************r-e-k-l-a-m-a************** Chcesz oszczędzić na kosztach obsługi bankowej ? mBIZNES - konto dla firm http://epieniadze.onet.pl/mbiznes
