Herb: with all due respect, and I know I'm going to get lambasted with this comment. I have to disagree here. I would not say that PUG represents a group significantly above average. We would all like to think we are, and if we tell ourselves that enough we begin to believe it. But I don't buy it. There are some very good shooters on the list, some good shooters and plenty of, let's say, beginners. I think PUG is a pretty good representation of Pentax shooters. And I maintain that it is not equipment that stands in our way of getting great shots... Vic
In a message dated 3/18/03 12:06:17 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >the PUG isn't remotely close to being representative. it represents a level >of technical expertise significantly above average. > > > >Herb....
