>Yes, Iīve read all about MZ-S. And MZ-S (featured *by*
>Pentax as a *semi-pro* gear) and its probable price
>(serious, would you pay more than US$700 for that
>camera?), make me believe too that they definetively
>abandoned pro photographers. Or they want pro
>photographers to abandon them (as somebody said).
>Thatīs a question of common sense I think...
>
>Regards,
>
>Claude (ignoring depressed/bitter people and
>depressed/stupid answers)
I used to think the MZ-S worthed USD700 too. However, if it really offered
the durability of the LX, the situation is different. Remember, high built
quality does not come cheap (not just cameras). And from what I can see,
MZ-S is not a muscle camera which Nikon and Canon rule. I think the
backpackers and travellers would love the MZ-S - small and durable.
regards,
Alan Chan
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
