I didn't mean It will sell fine. I was just saying that
it is not difficult to build a digital back for a film
camera.... I am sure it will not sell well but we can
dream about a world where money is not so important ... :) 

Alex

John Francis wrote:
> Your opinion, obviously, differs.  But while you might be satisfied
> with the limitations such a system would enforce, I don't think you
> are representative of the typical consumer.  Pentax (and the other
> manufacturers) will sell more cameras by ignoring you and putting
> their research and marketing dollars somewhere else.
> Don't feel too bad - they are ignoring me, too.   I'd rather have
> a PZ-2p than an MZ-S, and I'd rather have a $2000 digital camera
> with a partial-frame sensor that a $7000 MZ-D.
> 
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Alexandre A. P. Suaide, Ph.D.           mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Physics Department
University of Sao Paulo - Brazil        Phone: 1-313-577-5419
Wayne State University - MI -USA        ICQ number: 78139605
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to