LOL! Now if it turned it into a 300 then that would be fine... Out of interest, who uses focal lengths between 110 and 190 regularly? And what for? I find them too tight for portraits (unless I was outside I guuess, where I could back up farther) and not long enough to be a useful telephoto. Same goes for the 30-60 range for me.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Alan Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 15 October 2003 22:43 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Has Pentax missed again? > > > >The FA50 1.4 is lovely. Had no use for that focal length > before, but > >with the 1.5 factor it(or the 43) was a must. My > unhappiness with the > >77 has nothing to do with the picture quality, just that my > favourite > >lens now has a focal length that it of little use to me. > > And who says longer is better? :-) > > Alan Chan > http://www.pbase.com/wlachan > > _________________________________________________________________ > The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail > >
