Dave wrote: DM> I also am very interested in this use of slave flash. I would have expected DM> the TTL functions to operate normally on the camera for not only the onboard DM> or external mounted flash but also for the slave flash. If you set the DM> slave for less then you expect to need 1/16 etc, then the on camera flash DM> would make up the difference wouldn't it? It would read the total provided DM> light from both flashes via TTL and provide the necessary amount on the on DM> camera flash to provide correct exposure.
DM> I'm not saying I know this to be true, but rather pose this as a question. It pretty much does so, provided the slave flash doesn't overexpose the main subject. When in a hurry, I set the 360FGZ in auto mode on one stop wider aperture than the one on camera to make sure it provides half of the necessary light at most. For careful setups I prefer the manually adjusted output based on aperture, distance, light loss on bouncing and how important the slave is in the combination. Even if it works quite well - still I see the need for a full wireless P-TTL. Servus, Alin
