On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, William Robb wrote: > I had one for a while. I found it to be quite sharp, and surprisingly, > not overly flarey. I thought the colour rendition was a bit garish, it > might fit in well with Canon lenses in this regard. I found a good deal > on a Super Takumar 17mm fisheye, and ended up selling the Zenitar to a > fellow list member.
And I've been happy with it. Build quality is good, though I always find it a bit disconcerting when the front part of the barrel, complete with lens group(s), can screw off. A lot of Pentax 200/4s can do that. I don't mind the optical quality... it's good enough for anything I'd use a fisheye on a 35mm camera for. chris
