From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> >I'll confess I find it difficult to look at her,  I  should be lying if I 
> did not.  
> >annsan
> 
> Okay, I'll add one thing, because I finally figured out how to word it, 
> annsan.
> 
> By trying to "protect" her you are coming from the place that she NEEDS 
> protection. I.E. That there is something "wrong" with her, something defective, 
> something less than, something disabled, or maybe something even obscene, in a > 
> sense.

When annsan speaks in this thread her words can be summed up in one word - "empathy". 
Obviously this is something you and too many others in this thread show a lamentable 
lack of.
Your words in the above paragraph is pathetically patronizing and if I were annsan I'd 
find them insulting.
 
> Get it?
> Lots of people don't like other people protecting them, because of 
> the downside implication of that protection.
> 
> I've encountered disabled people (wheel chair types) who don't like people 
> falling all over them to help them just for that reason. Some do, of course, 
> because opening a door or something may be difficult for them. But others do not.
> No one likes to be pitied. 
> 
> It was an honest portrayal.
> I am now seriously tempted to go out and do street photography, and 
> especially do unflattering, honest portrayals of fat people, ugly people, disabled 
> people, homeless people, etc., just to confront our own inherent prejudices. 

Sheesh... 

Lasse


Reply via email to