50 years ago companies in the US were required to support their products for a minimum of 7 years after production ceased. I do not think that is so any longer. Strangely, we seem to have quietly done away with most of the consumer protection laws here in the US during the past couple of decades.

--

Anthony Farr wrote:

Not at all, Bob.

The specialist camera makers can shelter under the umbrella of the film and
camera manufacturers.  So long as Kodak and Fuji sell film cameras the
~hardware only~ manufacturers can rest assured that film will be available
for the required period.

But on the day that no film manufacturer also sells a film camera there will
be much rearranging of the deckchairs on the Titanic.  I predict that no
company would risk the legal ramifications of selling a film camera if Kodak
and Fuji also withdraw from film camera sales.

Like I said, while Kodak and Fuji sell film ~cameras~, film has ten years
minimum life expectancy.

regards,
Anthony Farr

----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob Walkden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


Hi,

that would not be a very clever argument. It would imply that the
camera makers such as Pentax also had to be film makers. Or that
kitchen equipment makers also had to be food retailers; printer
manufacturers would have to be paper makers. Law-makers would have to
be Fagins. Cup makers would have to guarantee a water supply.

--
Cheers,
Bob






-- graywolf http://graywolfphoto.com

"You might as well accept people as they are,
you are not going to be able to change them anyway."




Reply via email to