>In a message dated 2/24/2004 10:48:55 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Sometimes OT gets a little out of hand, but it dies down. You have introduced this PAW thing which mostly is good. I do think however that the one on the Leica list you modeled it after limits photos to those taken with Leica equipment. Also they seem to limit it to one photo a week person. You are trying to open this list to anything, anywhere, anytime, no limits. And then snarling at the guy who is paying for this list out of his own pocket. >Like I said, PAW seems like a great idea. But maybe we should keep it to Pentax equipment, and one shot per person per week on this list. Furthermore, there are all kinds of sites on the web where you can post photos to be commented on and no one has ever objected to folks mentioning here that they had a photo on one they would like comments about. Well, if you limit it to Pentax equipment, I cannot participate. And maybe I should drop off the list completely since I no longer have any Pentax equipment and will probably not be getting some. Or getting some any time soon. But I do think PAWs ought to be limited to one photograph a week per person, since it's called "Photograph of the Week." Whatever Doug decides, I guess. Personally I like the PAWs a great deal. And I think the overwhelming response indicates others do as well. It's a nice counter balance to all the technical talk. Threads like OT English cars I can live without, ergo, I delete them. Marnie aka Doe :-)
