On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, graywolf wrote: > which punch holes in the negative. (Maybe there is a business opportunity there? > No, not in a town as small as this one.)
Mail order? Kostas
- Re: Film vs Digita, was: lRe: Pentax is Dying? Chris Stoddart
- Re: Film vs Digita, was: lRe: Pentax is Dying? Tom C
- RE: Film vs Digita, was: lRe: Pentax is Dying? Tom C
- RE: Film vs Digita, was: lRe: Pentax is Dying? J. C. O'Connell
- Re: 35 v. MF v. LF (was Film vs Digita) Norm Baugher
- Re: 35 v. MF v. LF (was Film vs Digita) William Robb
- Re: 35 v. MF v. LF (was Film vs Digi... johnbailey
- Re: 35 v. MF v. LF (was Film vs... graywolf
- Re: 35 v. MF v. LF (was Fil... William Robb
- Re: Film vs Digita, was: lRe: Pentax is Dyin... graywolf
- Re: Film vs Digita, was: lRe: Pentax is ... Kostas Kavoussanakis
- Re: Film vs Digita, was: lRe: Pentax is Dying? Bruce Dayton
- Re: Film vs Digita, was: lRe: Pentax is Dying? William Robb
- RE: Film vs Digita, was: lRe: Pentax is Dying? Rob Studdert
- RE: Film vs Digita, was: lRe: Pentax is Dying? J. C. O'Connell
- Re: Film vs Digita, was: lRe: Pentax is Dying? Steve Desjardins
- RE: Film vs Digita, was: lRe: Pentax is Dying? J. C. O'Connell
- Re: Film vs Digita, was: lRe: Pentax is Dying? William Robb
- RE: Film vs Digita, was: lRe: Pentax is Dying? Tom C
- RE: Film vs Digita, was: lRe: Pentax is Dying? J. C. O'Connell
