Wow, a lot of discussion going on here suddenly :-)
I just like to say that I agree with Chris on this.
Although I liked doing comments (and even more receiving them :-) it DID have
a touch of "school-work". The assignment is also random, meaning you get to
comment on images that you normally wouldn't have because they don't do
anything to you.
I think I'll be more comfortable commenting on the "highlights" that are in
every PUG I have seen sofar ...
Regards, JvW
On Fri, 4 May 2001 00:05:33 -0500 (CDT), Chris Brogden wrote:
>
>So, beginning with the June PUG, I won't be coordinating the comments any
>more. If you want to talk about any photos that catch your eye, feel free
>to do so. If you want people to critique your photo, just ask the
>list. Some people have mentioned that the idea of critiquing every photo
>on the PUG violates its open nature, and I can see the point that they're
>making. The point seems to be that the PUG is more of a place to share
>photos that interest us, and that critiquing all of the photos is against
>the open spirit of the PUG. So... less work for me. :) Consider the
>experiment officially dead as of now.
---------------------------------------------------------
Jan van Wijk; www.fsys.demon.nl
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
