Actually Shel's mis-typed URL worked fine with Firefox. I didn't even notice

Don Sanderson wrote:

Nice Shel.
This'll work better tho:
http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/marnie.jpg ;-)

Don



-----Original Message-----
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 9:56 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO: Invitation to Hike


Yes, you want to mask the bright area. It's quite simple. Not knowing all
the commands and features in elements, I may be using the wrong terms and
definitions, but I know you're clever enuf to figure it out.


1:      Create a duplicate background layer;

2: Use the magic wand (which seems to work well in this case,
. other selection techniques may be a better choice in other
. situations) on the duplicate layer and set the tolerance to about 25;


3:      Set the wand to non contiguous;

4:      Click on an area that's representative of the washed out sky;

5:      Very lightly feather the selection (1 pixel should do it);

6:      Choose a blue to replace the washed out area;

7:      Using a brush of appropriate size set to 100% opacity
.       and to darken, paint over the selected area ;

8:      Using the opacity slider in the layers palette, adjust the sky
.       to whatever density you like (with the blue I used 35% opacity
.       seemed fine);

9:      Deselect the selected area.

Here's the pic with the adjustment:
http:home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/marnie.jpg

Nice pic, BTW ;-))


Shel





[Original Message]
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>




Yes, but that would affect the whole photo. I think in this kind of


situation

I would need to mask an area, a small area, then do

shadow/highlight. And

right now my skills are not such that I can mask a small area yet.







--
A man's only as old as the woman he feels.
                        --Groucho Marx



Reply via email to