It is obviously not pro spec, it has RTF. Terence Mac Goff wrote: > > Just because Pentax says its a Pro-spec camera, and prices it accordingly, > doesn't mean it is a Pro-spec camera when compared to the range of other > offerings at the moment in the pro range. An Eos-1, F5, F100, Dynax 9 (or > 7) or EOS 3 it aint (nor was it meant to be). However, that is the "Pro" > spec of the moment. -- Tom "Graywolf" Rittenhouse Graywolf Photo, Charlotte, NC, USA ------------------------------------------ - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (first UK review) Jim Brooks
- Re: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (first UK... Terence Mac Goff
- Re: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (firs... Pĺl Jensen
- Re: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (... Bucky
- Re: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (... Bucky
- Re: MZ-S review in Amateur Photograph... Pĺl Jensen
- Re: MZ-S review in Amateur Photograph... Doug Franklin
- Re: MZ-S review in Amateur Photo... Peter Alling
- Re: MZ-S review in Amateur Photograph... Jim Moniz
- Re: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (... Tom Rittenhouse
- RE: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (firs... Tom Rittenhouse
- RE: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (first UK... Rob Brigham
- Re: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (first UK... Rfsindg
- RE: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (first UK... Jim Brooks
- RE: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (first UK... Cotty
- Re: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (firs... Tom Rittenhouse
- Re: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (... Aaron Reynolds
- Re: Digital (was Re: MZ-S review in A... Doctor Digi
- Re: Digital (was Re: MZ-S review in A... Mark D.
- Digital weddings - or why I want a fu... John Mustarde
- Re: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (first UK... Jarosław Brzeziński