I still shoot B&W, stopped for a bit while the D was new, but I'm on my
2nd roll of Tri-X this week (Least I hope it's Tri-X, it's labelled
Tri-X 24exp, but I'm up to exp33 and the rewind know indicates it's
feeding, so no idea what's actually in the can)
I'm also up to a nice number of lenses. I've got a 200mm f4 XR Rikenon,
135mm f2.8 Kenlock in M42, 50mm f2 SMC-M, 50mm f1.4 Super Takumar, 28mm
f2.8 Formula 5 and the 18-55 SMC-DA. I need something wider than 28mm
for digital and film and something in the 77-100mm gap, but for the
latter I'm holding out for a 77 Limited.
-Adam
cbwaters wrote:
the LX would be nice but, man...you shooting any film anymore? I
probably can't justify having one with the pitiful lens collection
I've got...I need more glass before I can buy another body.
CW
----- Original Message ----- From: "Adam Maas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <pentax-discuss@pdml.net>
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 8:51 PM
Subject: Opinions, please
I'm going to have some disposable income next week, and am planning
on some acquisitions.
Possibilities include:
14mm DA for my *istD (Giving me an ultra-wide, right now my widest
options are the 18-55 on the D and a 28mm on my little Ricoh KR-5sv)
or
LX + lens. Probably a 24 or 20, If the 20, I'm likely to grab a CZJ
20mm Distagon.
And I'm also looking at maybe getting a 45-125/4 SMCP for the
digital. It would be essentially a 70-185 on the D. Anybody tried
this lens on a Digital?
-Adam
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.8/162 - Release Date:
11/5/2005
