I don't even have to test that to know it is true. We seem to be talking
on different wave lengths.
All I said in response to your original post was that browsers do not
have to be color management savy because they assume all web images are
sRGB.
I also said that Photoshops "Save For Web" converts images to sRGB by
default. Note however that as far as I know it does not insert a sRGB
color profile.
The "s" in "sRGB" is short for "standard". The web concept is based upon
images being standardRGB images. Once that assumption is made you do not
need color profile conversion features, or color profiles at all, in the
browsers. If you chose to use something different that is your problem.
sRGB is the lowest common denominator, all color systems (even AnnSan's
<grin>) should be able to display it properly, which is of course why it
was chosen.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
-----------------------------------
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 19 Dec 2005 at 23:46, graywolf wrote:
On my monitor the two sRGB images are identical. The profiled profoto
image is darker. The unprofiled profoto image is washed out and
yellowish. Of course I am running color management on my system rather
than just in photoshop, and profoto is probably newer than my drivers.
Want to put up a couple of Adobe 98 images? However, I really do need to
recalibrate my system it has been ages...
If all is working as it should be the images embedded with the ProPhoto RGB CS
should be able to be opened in PS even if you don't have the driver loaded
because the profile is embedded in the file. I'd like to know how the to images
with embedded profiles look in PS given that you don't have ProPhoto loaded, it
should work. :-)
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
