I'm going to try Nikon glass on a Pentax body Cotty.
A K mount ring and a spacer should do it.
I'll start with a cheap lens though, I value my NIKKOR-P
105/2.5 (100% mint) rather highly. ;-)
The view with the 105 held up to an ME Super was rather
awesome.

Don

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2005 5:23 PM
> To: pentax list
> Subject: Re: Nikon lens on M42 body???????
> 
> 
> On 31/12/05, Adam Maas, discombobulated, unleashed:
> 
> >Cotty, since the Nikon's register is longer, it would maintain infinity 
> >focus after being adapted to a K mount, but that would require a mount 
> >replacement instead of a straight adaptor, since it's only 1mm 
> >difference. It's going the other way that's impossible. The basic 
> >technique you used for the K to EOS adaptation should work.
> 
> Your words are not false Adam of Maas.
> 
> The Nikon register is 46.5 mm. The Pentax is 45.46 mm. In order to use
> an adapter of suitable thickness to maintain structural integrity
> (*love* the Trekisms), with a Pentax lens then an element must be used
> if infinity focus is to be kept. Of course, if a  mount change is done
> instead, including a 1mm increase in register, then it should be quite
> possible to do without the need of an optical element. I would question
> the need to do so, certainly on quality grounds as vintage Nikon glass
> rivals Pentax bottles. Except, of course, that it would be quite cool to
> wander about with an A*85 1.4 on an FM body :-)
> 
> 40 minites to midnight and I'm writing the damn list !! I'm ORF!
> 
> happy new year :-))))) 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Cheers,
>   Cotty
> 
> 
> ___/\__
> ||   (O)   |     People, Places, Pastiche
> ||=====|    http://www.cottysnaps.com
> _____________________________
> 
> 

Reply via email to