Ken didn't mean "flat" as in lacking contrast. He meant that he finds
that analog prints have more of a three dimensional look. I don't see
that, but he may well have a more discriminating eye.
On Mar 22, 2006, at 2:22 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
I've got to agree. When I have flat images, it's because I didn't
post processing them properly. You should work on those skills,
rather than relying on the lab to do that for you by using film.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 9:59:59 PM, you wrote:
GD> On Mar 21, 2006, at 9:18 PM, K.Takeshita wrote:
... But when printed, I cannot help noticing that the digital
images are always
flat (not always but many times). ...
GD> I'm sorry, Ken, but this is ridiculous.
GD> If you are printing images that look flat, they are not rendered
GD> correctly.
GD> Period.
GD> Godfrey
