It's not a matter of agreeing or disagreeing with you John. I got over the lack of aperture ring very quickly. As a matter of fact, it was never an issue for me as I own only one lens that doesn't have an "A" setting, and it lives on my LX. But I can appreciate how others feel about it being missing.
D-FA lenses those "designed specifically for digital cameras" (quoting Pentax) which cover the full 35mm frame & have an aperture ring. IMO there major feature is that they are designed with digital in mind & also cover the full 35mm frame, as opposed to DA's. Dave On 9/3/06, John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We'll just have to disagree. You think just the larger image circle > is enough to make a lens a DFA lens. I don't share that viewpoint. > > > On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 02:45:38AM +0800, David Savage wrote: > > The significance of DFA lens is that they cover the 35mm frame. Not > > all the DA's do without vignetting. > > > > Dave. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
