Inet Shopper wrote:
> Thanks for pointing out the 16-45/4. I'd wrongly assumed that it would be very > expensive, yet it's priced like the Tamron 17-35/2.8-4. It looks like the > cheap > route would be the kit lens and a used manual focus 28/2 or 35/2, and the more > expensive route would be the 16-45/4 with the FA 35/2. > > I'm aware of the Vivitar/Kiron 28/2 lenses. In fact my 28/2 in FD mount is a > Kiron, and I like it very much. But Kirons in Pentax KA mount aren't cheap or > common either... > Besides of the FA 35 mm. 2.0 I praised in this thread some messages ago, I also have the FA 28 mm. 2.8, and it is an excellent walkaround lens with the DS and other Pentax DSLRs. I now it isn't as fast as the 28 mm. 2.0 lenses you mention, but it is AF and it is 90% as good as the FA 35. Carlos -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
