As I stated in my last post, you/they didnt post any comparisons of MF lenses vs 35mm lenses done by them. If they had some directly comparable data on 35mm lenses that would be one thing but they dont. I still say though that the differences in the data they do have which is LF vs MF, the MF is better, so why is that? and why wouldnt it be true that 35mm is better than MF if MF is better than LF ? ? ? ? ? jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Robb Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2006 11:45 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Pentax 645D Sensor size(?) ----- Original Message ----- From: "J. C. O'Connell" Subject: RE: Pentax 645D Sensor size(?) > if you are saying that medium format lenses > in general are just as sharp as 35mm lenses > I do not agree. I am not ignoring anything > but you...What evidence are you presenting > to the contrary other than your comments? > NO more than I have... I posted a couple of links to published resolution numbers, you'd have seen them if you were following the thread. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
