Yes, I have. Quality. I have yet to see a screen with the same quality as a good print. The 21" apple monitor is OK, but still not that good. Not just the sharpness but also the texture of the picture is better on paper.
Movies are different, and I still prefer to watch a good movie in a cinema with darkness and no distractions from family, telephones etc. Action and science fiction may be OK to watch at home but I avoid looking at the really good ones at home. It just spoils the impression. DagT > > Fra: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Emne: RE: Please everyone set up an email filter > > Have you ever asked yourself WHY? > Its not very logical that you > can appreciate a really good "print" > but video picture quality doesnt > matter at all to you. That would only be logical > if you didnt watch TV at all. Umm, let's see, > maybe you are not aware of really how good > (how much better than analog) a HD image can look and thus assume > you dont or wouldnt care but you actually would once you > see the difference? Thats all I can > come with with your still being of sane mind.... > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > DagT > Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 5:18 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: Please everyone set up an email filter > > > No, it is true. I couldn´t care less about TV quality, but I love a > good print. So much in fact that I still make fiber based and > selenium toned BW prints from 6x6 negatives myself. Accept the > difference. > > DagT > > Den 19. des. 2006 kl. 23.04 skrev J. C. O'Connell: > > > I forgot something, THE PICTURE (quality) IS NOT > > IMPORTANT "for a lot" of people? Are you crazy? I am posting this > > stuff > > in a photo forum inhabited by mostly photographers. > > They should know better than that unless all they watch is > > hillbilly shows like COPS, Pro Wrestling, AND Fear Factor. Thats not > > the demographic of this group I dont think makes > > any sense to say that. Vastly improved picture > > quality enhances motion pictures just as much it does > > still pictures...Come on with this stuff! > > jco > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of > > Cory Papenfuss > > Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 4:23 PM > > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > Subject: RE: Please everyone set up an email filter > > > > > > On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, J. C. O'Connell wrote: > > > >> Why should I "accept" an opposing opinion > >> (especailly one I STRONGLY oppose) I that dont believe in or > >> cannot be > > > >> backed up with a good factual argument to support > >> it. I wont and never will. Its called conviction. > >> I dont expect everyone to agree with me on everything, > >> and many many things are gray which I avoid. > >> But to expect me to just "accept" anything else > >> without good cause is simply crazy. And secondly, > >> I honestly believe that there are people posting > >> here opposing viewpoints they dont even believe > >> in just to oppose me no matter what I post. > >> jco > >> > > > > You don't have to accept it. You should, however, realize that > > others might have a wildly different point of view and an opinion. > > That > > > > doesn't make them wrong, just different from your viewpoint. When you > > express your *opinion* as FACT and then argue with those who don't > > agree > > > > with those "facts," it incites anoyance. > > > > The HDTV "argument" was particularly obtuse. Yes the picture is > > > > better... quantifiably so. Yes the prices have come down... they are > > still not cheap. You fail to understand that for a lot of people, > > TV is > > > > not very important... whether the picture is NTSC or IMAX, it doesn't > > matter to them. It's a *personal choice* on their part that you > > need to > > > > be able to accept and understand. > > > > -Cory > > > > -- > > > > ********************************************************************** > > > ** > > * > > * Cory Papenfuss, Ph.D., PPSEL-IA > > * > > * Electrical Engineering > > * > > * Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University > > * > > ********************************************************************** > > > ** > > * > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > PDML@pdml.net > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > PDML@pdml.net > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > DagT > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
