I agree: I like the rendering at ISO 1600 and 800, while the DS body is just a hair smoother the K10D gives a nicer texturing. But I tend to push the values down a bit more for a deeper look.
The K10D is taking over as my standard camera now, I'm thrilled with it. I think all the others I've got are going on the market and I'll get a second K10D body for backup. Only a couple of film cameras will remain for nostalgia and occasional fun, and the Fuji F30 for a pocketable besides it. Godfrey On Dec 30, 2006, at 5:50 PM, George Sinos wrote: > The more I use the K10d the more I like the "look" of it's images. > Even though there is some noise in this photo, it's not obscuring > detail. For instance, the hair of the girl on the right against the > brick wall. The noise reminds me more of film grain than digital > noise. I think the Pentax engineers hit it on the nose. > >> ISO 1600 in Tva mode. >> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5390592&size=lg -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
