Yes, I'm moving toward a second K10D as well. The D is nice, but not as nice as the K10. This shot looks a bit too thin, but that's because I processed it on my laptop without a calibrated monitor. (I subsequently looked at it on my work computer.) I have a tough time getting exposures right on the laptop, but I still use it when I don't have time to get down to the work computer. I can't calibrate the monitor on the laptop, because I don't have administrator privileges. However, the IT guy at work has promised to install the Spider 2 software for me when we go back after the holidays. So bear with me until then:-). Paul On Dec 30, 2006, at 9:42 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> I agree: I like the rendering at ISO 1600 and 800, while the DS body > is just a hair smoother the K10D gives a nicer texturing. But I tend > to push the values down a bit more for a deeper look. > > The K10D is taking over as my standard camera now, I'm thrilled with > it. I think all the others I've got are going on the market and I'll > get a second K10D body for backup. Only a couple of film cameras will > remain for nostalgia and occasional fun, and the Fuji F30 for a > pocketable besides it. > > Godfrey > > On Dec 30, 2006, at 5:50 PM, George Sinos wrote: > >> The more I use the K10d the more I like the "look" of it's images. >> Even though there is some noise in this photo, it's not obscuring >> detail. For instance, the hair of the girl on the right against the >> brick wall. The noise reminds me more of film grain than digital >> noise. I think the Pentax engineers hit it on the nose. >> >>> ISO 1600 in Tva mode. >>> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5390592&size=lg > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
