Very good. You certainly don't need any more detail than that. You can get it, but you don't need it for a group photo. Paul On Jan 21, 2007, at 11:55 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
> Ok, here is a K10D shot of a group of 12. K10D, DA 16-45/4, ISO 200, > 1/125 sec @ f/13, studio strobes. > > Reference photo: > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/shaeffer_009.htm > > 100% view of a single person: > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/shaeffer_009a.htm > > -- > Bruce > > > Sunday, January 21, 2007, 7:47:22 PM, you wrote: > > GD> Absolutely. The need for detailing and tonal resolution by such > high > GD> frequency scenes demands big pixel numbers, and currently that > means > GD> Phase One backs on medium format cameras or film. It's not the > same > GD> as producing a group photo for the web. > > GD> The right tool for the job is essential. For what Jens is > doing, the > GD> *ist D would suffice, the K10D will do even better. > > GD> Godfrey > > GD> On Jan 21, 2007, at 2:47 PM, Mark Cassino wrote: > >>> As a practical example - I'm working today on an entry for an art >>> show, >>> hosted by the local at museum. I've been struggling all day to get a >>> decent 12x18 print of this shot: >>> >>> http://www.markcassino.com/galleries/stream/061201/_IGP0058.htm >>> >>> It was taken with the K10D. ... >>> On the flip side, the other image that I plan on submitting is a 28 >>> x 23 >>> inch print of this framed out generously and sitting in my dining >>> room: >>> >>> http://www.markcassino.com/galleries/asga/asga00.htm >>> >>> That was taken with a 6x7, 55mm f4, and scanned on a lowly Epson >>> 3200. > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
