I have the 645 (manual, not autofocus), and while it's a little bulky for small hands, it is my favorite camera. I'd like to acquire the 67, but I do mostly people photography, so the 645 is a little better suited to my needs with its (slightly) higher flash sync. I was able to get a good used body and back from KEH at less than $700 and an 75mm (non leaf shutter) for around $225 off ebay, so the 645 is rather reasonably priced, and lenses in good condition aren't terribly expensive -- below 300mm, that is. It's a heckuva lot of fun, if you decide to go with that option. Although that larger neg IS tempting ...
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Dalal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 5:38 PM Subject: Re: 645 or 67? > From: "marisa mack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > <snip> > > > I'm feeling a little bit overwhelmed and would love to understand why > those > > that have the 67 chose it over the 645 and vice-versa, unless > > it's purely a preference with regard to negative size, ack! > > Please help, I'm sorry that I can't give more info, I'm just not > > exactly sure what questions to ask even, this is how uninformed - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
