Mike Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Mark wrote: > >> This sudden change, whatever the rationale, is inexcusable. Yes, digital >> technology is advancing at a tremendous rate and the market for it isn't >> stable. But in October of 2001 they can't really expect me to believe that >> this is NEWS to them and that it's taken them by surprise. > >While I sympathize with you, Mark, I don't think I agree...if you're getting >a complex cutting-edge electronic product from a subcontractor, and the >subcontractor runs into unexpected problems and delays, what are you going >to do? You can't very well "will" a product to market that you can't bring >to market.
Ah, you're assuming it's delays in availability of parts from the subcontractors driving this. I was assuming that they were telling the truth and had *decided* to halt or push back development of the digital SLR because the market's moving too fast. I believe you may be right. -- Mark Roberts www.robertstech.com - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
