Actually, DOF has to do with nothing but magnification and the diameter of the aperture. Everything else is just another way of expressing those values. --graywolf
----- Original Message ----- From: dave o'brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:29 AM Subject: Re: Pentax Digital NEWS - FULL STORY from AP 27th OCT. > A scroll of mail from Francis Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, > 23 Oct 2001 14:15:08 +0100 > Read it? y > >I am curious about your comment about increased DOF with a smaller > >format. I was always under the impression that we get more DOF with > >35mm over MF because the typical print magnification is less. Am I > >missing something more subtle here? > > DOF has to do with the focal length and the f-stop. Print > magnification has nothing whatsoever to do with it. > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
