----- Original Message ----- From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 4:13 PM Subject: Re: Pentax Digital NEWS - FULL STORY from AP 27th OCT.
> On 22 Oct 2001, at 14:07, aimcompute wrote: > > > When we > > get down to it, it's not the size of the 35mm frame that renders a high quality > > photo or not (stating the obvious... sorry). It's the overall quality of the > > lenses and recording device, regardless of the dimensions of the frame size. > > Certainly a CCD of higher density is overall more important than it's > > dimensions. Rob wrote: > > Certainly is not, what do you reckon the quality of a 6MP CCD of 2mm x > 3mm dimension would be? Tom Says: Well I'm sure you're correct and I was technically vague. I was speaking more to the desire that a CCD be particular x dimension by y dimenson, than I was small vs. large. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
