Front loads have been around for a long time, even here.  The old 
technology is much easier to repair, and usually costs less than new 
electronic devices, which seem to designed to not be repaired.

Tom C wrote:
> Well I don't claim to be a rocket scientist.  It usually take me 2 or 3 
> trips to the parts store or tool store before I get things right because I 
> learn as I go.  I was happy to have saved at least $325.
>
> Two advantages of the newer front load washers (long popular in Europe and 
> only becoming popular in the USA over the last decade for home use) is that 
> they use about 1/3 the water as older top load washers and are much easier 
> on clothes.
>
>
> Tom C.
>
>
>   
>> From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net>
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net>
>> Subject: Re: Don't want to sound too alarmist but...
>> Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 12:49:04 -0400
>>
>> And it drys cloths no better than the 30 year old dryer I bought for
>> $25.00 12 years ago, and fixed for less than $10.  Replacing all of the
>> temperature sensors and door switch in less than two hours.  (I ended up
>> giving it away 6 months ago as I had no place to store it).
>>
>> Tom C wrote:
>>     
>>>> What all these problems really indicate is how cheap, low-spec most
>>>> of the electronic components being used are, even in high-end
>>>> cameras. Curiously, my 1966 RCA transistor radio that cost me $20
>>>> (expensive back then!) is still going strong.
>>>>
>>>> Godfrey
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> Likely planned obsolescence?
>>>
>>> On a side note, I just fixed our 2000 Maytag Neptune washer which had
>>> stopped spinning clothes in the spin cycle.  If it had failed about two 
>>>       
>> yeas
>>     
>>> ago I could have gotten it fixed for free under the terms of a class 
>>>       
>> action
>>     
>>> lawsuit.
>>>
>>> It was going to cost upwards of $400 for a service call, an entire new 
>>>       
>> main
>>     
>>> control board, and an item called a wax motor which is essential to 
>>>       
>> locking
>>     
>>> the door. I replaced the wax motor (ultimate source of the problem) 
>>>       
>> along
>>     
>>> with a blown resistor and two transistors on the main board.  In the 
>>>       
>> process
>>     
>>> I ruined a metal 'leaf' spring that holds the wax motor in place and 
>>>       
>> super
>>     
>>> glued a switch closed, until the new parts arrived. Cost of my repair
>>> including parts which I runied in the process was under $75 dollars, 
>>>       
>> though
>>     
>>> I have about 10 hours invested in it.
>>>
>>> Tom C.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>> --
>> All dogs have four legs; my cat has four legs. Therefore, my cat is a dog.
>>
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>     
>
>
>
>   


-- 
All dogs have four legs; my cat has four legs. Therefore, my cat is a dog.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to