On 12/09/2007, Pål Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I admit I am a novice when it comes to photoshop. I hate it!
I really don't know how to help you there, I think it's great but then I've made sure that I understand what it's doing so that I have full control of it. > Anyway, many of the original slides look more vobrant and saturated than the > images posted at Photo.net. That's fine but it really indicates very little, transparency is a very different medium from video display. In order to make a valid and useful comparision to your screen your slides should be viewed using a back light source that emulates the 100% white colour and level of your screen. Also the view that you see will depend on the calibration of your monitor as well as the colourspace/browser interaction. There are too many variables, all I can say is that on my pair of calibrated monitors they look pretty severely over saturated and I'd be very surprised if they didn't look as saturated to anyone else with similarly calibrated equipment. -- Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/PESO http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
