Actually, IIRC, with few exceptions, medium format lenses have lower native resolution figures that 35mm. They don't need it due to the size of the photosensitive surface they're projecting an image on.
Adam Maas wrote: > I dunno about that. The 1DsmIII is pushing the limits of what 35mm > glass is capable of. While a ~22MP 645D wouldn't necessarily compete > well (Although the Mamiya ZD back is selling every unit Mamiya can > push out, at a similar cost to the 1DsmIII) a higher-rez unit might > well be competetive, and there's a lot more resolution headroom with > good MF glass. > > -Adam > > On 12/4/07, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> An interesting user review of the new Canon 1Ds MkIII, which confirms my >> feeling that the 645D was swimming upstream without the spawning >> possibilities... >> >> http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/mada-iiis.shtml >> >> I would consider this very bad news for an eventual 645D if it were ever >> introduced. >> >> -- >> The difference between individual intelligence and group intelligence is the >> difference between Harvard University and the Harvard University football >> team. >> >> -- P. J. O'Roarke >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. >> >> > > > -- The difference between individual intelligence and group intelligence is the difference between Harvard University and the Harvard University football team. -- P. J. O'Roarke -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
